design [from previous edition[
Measuring Factory output In
reviewing the JamFactory Biennial, Margot Osborne
considers whether the centre’s stated aims are being
achieved.
THE JamFactory Biennial deserves special
scrutiny this year as it marks the 30th year of the JamFactory.
Premier Rann is perpetually recalling the golden years of
the Dunstan era and the establishment of the Jam Factory is
often cited as an achievement of that period. That the organisation
has survived this long (despite existing in a chronic state
of financial stress) is not in itself sufficient cause for
celebration. It has always received the lion’s share
of visual arts/craft funding from the State coffers, so the
question as to whether JamFactory is a successful survivor
is worth asking.
My paradoxical conclusion is that the JamFactory has never
been successful at what it was set up to do – namely,
to combine provision of on-the-job training with production
of commercially viable craft products through teams of trainee
practitioners working under the guidance of a master craft
practitioner. The model has been flawed from the start and
evolution over the years has left in place the problems built
into the core of the Jam’s operations.
Driven by the financial necessity of meeting sales targets,
truckloads of often mediocre or frankly awful bowls and vases,
made under duress by insufficiently skilled trainees who would
really prefer to be doing their own one-off work, have been
distributed to gift shops around the country. Even so, the
books never seem to balance. A succession of administrators
have fled to saner employment, unable to stand the stress
of overdue accounts.
Workshop Heads (now called Creative Directors) have rapidly
burnt out and left in frustration at the lack of time for
their own professional development while they chased the dollars
of corporate commissions. Trainees (now called Design Associates)
often finish their two-year term demoralised and frustrated
at the difficulty of balancing professional creative development
with constant pressure to contribute to the Jam’s revenue.
Yet it is a tradition to ignore these problems and attribute
them to jaded ex-employees. It is also a tradition for management
to put up a fire-wall between the Board and any morale problems
in-house.
The Jam’s successes, and these are substantial, are
an almost accidental bi-product of its professed core business
as an on-the-job training institution. It is the fluid interconnection
with the wider South Australian professional field through
the Jam’s access facilities, rental studios, retail/wholesale
operations and exhibitions that are the essence of its success
and its importance to the State.
Front-of-house operations, namely the shop and gallery, are
a raging success and a popular destination for South Australians
and tourists alike. Neither rely on output from the Jam’s
design studios, although Purple Space exhibitions frequently
showcase current and recent design associates. The shop and
gallery are mutually supportive in attracting visitation levels
that are rivalled only by the big North Terrace institutions.
Behind the scenes, the Jam’s four design studios generate
a high-energy creative environment, especially in the glass
studios, where professional glass-blowers as well as the Jam’s
official inmates use the facilities from early until late.
In the independent rental studios upstairs, emerging designer-makers
who have recently finished their training programs add to
the feeling of a place teeming with creative activity.
Many trainees and studio heads have vanished without trace
interstate or overseas but others have stayed to work here,
for shorter or longer periods. Gradually over the years they
have formed the core of a flourishing semi-permanent SA craft
community that includes a disproportionate number of outstanding
artists and designers with national and increasingly international
profiles.
The irony for the JamFactory is that individual one-off work
and experimental research that happens under its roof, often
out of hours and only indirectly subsidised (compared to the
substantial running costs of the core Training program), are
its real creative strength. The downside is that so much subsidy,
administrative overheads and corporate attention are devoted
to keeping the wheels on a faulty model, instead of further
developing its inherent potential as an innovative R&D
facility at the nexus of craft and design.
The JamFactory Biennial showcases some of this one-off independent
work by the Jam’s studio heads and the current crop
of design associates, as opposed to the corporate gifts, trophies
or bread-and-butter wholesale lines that take up much of their
time. In the final balance, the Biennial is vindication of
the creative importance of JamFactory. It offers abundant
evidence of potential among design associates, many of whom
have come to the Jam after graduating from the SA School of
Art.
Honor Freeman’s Tupperware series in delicate pastel
shades wittily plays on the incongruity of fine porcelain
masquerading as plastic. Complex decals by Tracey Rosser are
very new-millennium in their digital patterning, though I
wish she would develop more interesting blanks as a vehicle
for her decoration. Luke Mount is outstanding among the glass
associates. His gorgeous Rough Diamond bottle in acid green
with an exquisite tapering stopper is reminiscent of his namesake
Nick Mount, though they are apparently not related.
Sim Luttin’s jewellery features appealing abstract organic
patterns in silver and mild steel. However jewellers Katrina
Freene and Kath Inglis, whose work is generally fresh and
innovative, do not seem to have found the right vehicles for
the Biennial. Freene’s earrings are disappointingly
humdrum despite her overly serious statement in the catalogue
that this work is about the “representation of the female
within popular culture”. Inglis’s fan-shaped wall
piece may have subtleties that eluded me, but appeared like
an experiment that did not quite come off.
Among furniture associates, Anna-Claire Petre’s elegantly
balanced plywood and steel stools stand out from the pack,
though I could not test them to see if they were actually
functional as well as good-looking. Similarly, Jim Hannon-Tan’s
veneered plywood furniture looks beautiful as sculpture but
may not stand up to usage.
Exhibits by JamFactory’s staff, including Creative Directors
and technical managers, are strong overall. Eclipsing all
others in its sheer presence, Deb Jones’s cast lead
crystal form has pellucid depths and limpid shifts in tone.
In contrast, her colleague Tom Moore indulges in his trademark
quirky humour as a foil for technical dexterity. Metal Studio
head Sue Lorraine reveals a new direction, leaving behind
for the moment her museum of internal organs to move into
the realm of natural history museums with a cleverly conceived
Vitrine, from which flutter “moth-eaten moth”
brooches in mild steel. |
 |

Vitrine with "Moth-Eaten" Moths, 2003, by
Sue Lorraine
Margot Osborne is an independent curator
and writer. She is a former Exhibitions Curator of JamFactory
Gallery and has a continuing involvement with JamFactory
as a guest curator of travelling exhibitions.
|
 |

|
|