The subject of months of anticipation and speculation among South Australian arts organisations and audiences, the pair of documents – a colourful 48-page ‘Arts Plan’ and the 128-page review that underwrites it – together read less like a vision for the future and more like a stocktake exercise, highlighting current strengths in South Australia’s arts sector and how they might be refined across 45 recommendations. As the review’s opening page makes clear, the report “does not necessarily reflect the views of the Government or indicate its commitment to a particular course of action”, with the government releasing a separate document detailing its responses to Grybowski and Gherashe’s recommendations.
Notably, the review “does not make recommendations requiring significant additional government expenditure”, a point that may sting for much of the arts community especially in the wake of the state government’s $31.9 million cuts to arts funding and the absorption of Arts South Australia into the Department of Premier and Cabinet in 2018. While it does call for an immediate injection of funding to support the storage and digitisation of South Australia’s cultural collections – partly addressed in the June state budget’s $2.6 million commitment to improving storage facilities for Aboriginal cultural material – the report regards the reliance of the state’s arts sector on government funding as a key issue to be addressed, rather than shrinking levels of government support.
Noting the importance of funding as an issue facing creators and organisations, with a $4.9 million cut in the 2018-19 state budget likely to grow to an annual $9.2 million by 2021, the report highlights the growing necessity of alternate funding streams such as philanthropy and private sector support. Despite an overwhelming 72 per cent of 1,800 surveyed respondents disagreeing or strongly disagreeing with the proposition that the South Australian government is adequately funding the arts, the report takes the “environment of reduced state government support” previously signalled by the state government as a given in the future.
While the government has accepted a recommendation to establish a pilot program of two-year ‘creative fellowships’, other proposals such as an arts investment funding model inspired by Arts Queensland’s return-driven, risk-managed and diversity-capitalising program, and an ‘Arts Organisation Collaboration Fund’, have been supported “in principle”. The government has also agreed to maintain the current structure of grant funding until a review in 2021.
Another review to create an updated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Arts Strategy will also be undertaken as recommended, alongside a pledge to implement “initiatives that support language revival [and] storytelling to honour Aboriginal cultures”. Overall, the “champion[ing] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander arts and culture” forms one of six goals laid out in the Arts Plan document.
Other prominent recommendations include the establishment of an annual schedule to better coordinate South Australia’s arts festivals throughout the year, to counter fears that the clustering of events during February and ‘Mad March’ causes the arts to suffer year-round. Given that years of festival-centric arts policy have already filled much of Adelaide’s calendar with annual and biennial festivals like Adelaide Cabaret Festival, OzAsia Festival, South Australia’s History Festival, SALA Festival, Tarnanthi, Adelaide Film Festival, Umbrella: Winter City Sounds, Adelaide Guitar Festival, DreamBIG and more, it’s unclear what this will entail short of a Department of Premier and Cabinet staffer setting up a new Google calendar. Perhaps a more succinct recommendation could be: identify the one month that doesn’t already have a festival and invent something new. Perhaps the hypothetical ‘Festival of Makers’ offered by JamFactory CEO Brian Parkes on page 25 of the Arts Plan document fits the bill?
Among the broad mission statements about fostering more ‘collaboration’ between arts organisations and making South Australia a centre for tertiary education the Arts, there are several specific proposals with varying degrees of detail, including an “Adelaide in 100 Objects” walking tour bringing together different sites and institutions around the city, a new shared ticketing system for small to medium arts organisations, a five-year-plan to revitalise regional art centres as community hubs, proposals for an arts-focussed high school and a long-called for new, acoustically-appropriate venue for the Adelaide Symphony Orchestra.
For the most part, the government’s response to these recommendations has been to accept where little new action is required or the recommendations are already in step with government policy. In other cases, such as the proposed ASO concert hall, the government has largely offered in-principle support… for the idea of exploring a business case. So perhaps hold off on buying your new opera-going outfit just yet.
As the state’s first major cultural review in nearly two decades, the plan’s research and creation enjoyed a substantial degree of buy-in from an arts community buffeted by years of shrinking funding at federal and state levels. Consequently, it’s likely this 128-page document and the government’s response will be the subject of much debate over the coming weeks as stakeholders and organisations unpack and respond to its findings.
Read the Arts Plan document here, the full report here, and the state government’s response to its recommendations here
Katina Olsen, Caleena Sansbury and Taree Sansbury perform mi:wi at Vitalstatistix, as featured in the Arts and Cultural Plan document (Photo: Gregory Lorenzatti)
Get the latest from The Adelaide Review in your inbox
Get the latest from The Adelaide Review in your inbox